Mainsail Partners Named a Top Private Equity Firm of 2025

Mainsail Partners is proud to be recognized among the Top Private Equity Firms of 2025 by GrowthCap.

“At Mainsail, we have deep respect for bootstrapped founders—their vision, discipline, and commitment to customers. For over 20 years, we’ve supported bootstrapped B2B software companies by working closely with founders and their teams to scale efficiently and build lasting value. Our focused approach continues to guide how we help companies grow into market leaders while honoring what makes them unique, and we are grateful to GrowthCap for recognizing why Mainsail is a Top Private Equity Firm again this year.” — Gavin Turner, Managing Partner

Learn More on Why Founders Choose to Partner with Mainsail

 

About GrowthCap’s Top Private Equity Firms of 2025:

According to GrowthCap, this year’s selections highlight firms that have demonstrated a consistent ability to serve as partners to companies and their management teams as they scale and establish a more competitive market position. Read more about the nominees here.

 

 

The Top Private Equity Firms of 2025 recognition presented herein is awarded by GrowthCap, a third-party that is not affiliated with Mainsail Partners or an investor in Mainsail Partners-sponsored vehicles. The recognition was awarded on 8/19/25 for the period 2025. GrowthCap assessed nominees based on written responses to questions on GrowthCap’s nomination form. The number of nominees reviewed for this recognition was not disclosed to Mainsail, and therefore, it and the percentage of nominees receiving the recognition, cannot be disclosed herein. GrowthCap’s recognition is based on its own evaluation and opinion and is not indicative of Mainsail Partners’ future performance, and does not reflect the experience of, or any rating by, Mainsail Partners’ investors. Mainsail Partners paid a fee to publish and distribute the GrowthCap Top Private Equity Firms of 2025 results. The receipt of compensation influences, and is likely to present a potential material conflict of interest, relating to the rating. There can be no assurance that other providers or surveys would reach the same conclusions as the foregoing. For more information regarding this recognition, please see the linked publication.