How To Think About Pricing Your Product

From Eddie Hartman’s presentation at the 2018 Mainsail Executive Summit

In today’s complex, customer-driven economy, it’s no longer enough to be innovative with your product. You also need to be innovative with your pricing strategy. According to the pricing firm Simon-Kucher & Partners, 72% of all innovations fail, and much of that failure stems from poor product-market-pricing fit.

“The rate of failure does not have to be this high,” Eddie Hartman told attendees at the 2018 Mainsail Partners Executive Summit. Now a Senior Manager at Simon-Kucher & Partners, Eddie formerly co-founded LegalZoom. “Pricing is such a simple way to make products succeed.”

In his presentation, Eddie provided an actionable model for shifting pricing to reflect the real value a product delivers to each customer.

Ask What People Are Willing to Pay

Innovators are constantly selling themselves, and their products, short. Driven by fear of rejection, they bring a product to market and then nearly give it away. One of the easiest ways to validate pricing before going to market is, simply, to ask. Eddie suggested the Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter, which asks a test group three questions: What is an acceptable price? An expensive price? A prohibitively expensive price?

SETTING THE PRICE USING THE VAN WESTENDORP PRICE SENSITIVITY METER

By gathering and charting that data, companies can visually discover “psychological cliffs”, or price points at which the consumer’s willingness to pay drastically changes. Somewhere in the middle of those answers lies your pricing sweet spot.

It’s Not Just What They Pay—It’s How They Pay

One of the most significant shifts in today’s economy is the diversity of price metrics and price structures. Flat license or per-seat pricing structures are becoming outdated.

Companies need to be in tune with their buyer and present a price metric and price structure that align with the value they hope to deliver.

Eddie provided the example of Evernote, a popular organizational app that recently reached a growth plateau. Its user base was loyal and fairly satisfied with the features the app provided. Evernote needed to move more users to the next tier but knew that charging per feature would lead to a revolt. Instead, they used “number of devices” as a price metric, and upgraded users to the next tier when they were syncing Evernote on multiple devices. Almost immediately, they found that users with multiple devices were comfortable shifting to the next tier.

If you are not finding the market traction you want at your current price point, consider implementing a different metric or a different structure. You just may find yourself capturing even more value.

One Size Does Not Fit All

You’ve set your price and you’ve innovated your price structure. Now, it’s time to create packages and pricing tiers. Realize that different groups of people are willing to pay different amounts for exactly the same thing, based on the value they derive from your product. Eddie refers to these groups as “action segments”, and encourages companies to think about how they can craft product tiers and pricing accordingly.

A classic example is Microsoft, which offers slightly different versions of its product to students, businesses and individuals, priced and packaged very differently. “Action segments provide brilliant insight because they let you create different packages,” explains Eddie. “One size almost never fits all.”


“Realize that different groups of people are willing to pay different amounts for exactly the same thing, based on the value they derive from your product.”


The Buyer is Never 100% Rational

Finally, remember that pricing is part art and part science. It’s as much psychology as it is economics, and it’s up to you to control the customer’s perception of your value.

The Economist, for example, used to offer two subscription tiers: Online-only for $59 a year, or Print/Web for $125 a year. The company preferred to sell the more expensive print and web subscription, but only 32% of customers chose it. Then, the Economist added a decoy option and displayed in on-screen between the existing two: Print-only, for $125 (the same price as Print/Web). Within a year, the Print/Web subscription rate grew from 32% to 84%. Exactly zero people selected the Print-only option, but that decoy offering made Print/Web look like a deal in comparison.

“Price is so much more than a number that ends in 99 cents. Pricing should tell a story,” summed up Eddie. Eddie’s presentation served as a reminder to think beyond product-market fit and to consider product-market-pricing fit.

Watch the full presentation from the Executive Summit here:

This content piece has been prepared solely for informational purposes. The content piece does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase any security. The information in this content piece is not presented with a view to providing investment advice with respect to any security, or making any claim as to the past, current or future performance thereof, and Mainsail Management Company, LLC (“Mainsail” or “Mainsail Partners”) expressly disclaims the use of this content piece for such purposes.

The information herein is based on the author’s opinions and views and there can be no assurance other third-party analyses would reach the same conclusions as those provided herein. The information herein is not and may not be relied on in any manner as, legal, tax, business or investment advice.

Third-party images, logos, and references included herein are provided for illustrative purposes only. Inclusion of such images, logos, and references does not imply affiliation with or endorsement for or by such firms or businesses.

Certain information contained in this content piece has been obtained from published and non‐published sources prepared by other parties, which in certain cases have not been updated through the date hereof. While such information is believed to be reliable for the purposes of this content piece, neither Mainsail nor the author assume any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such information and such information has not been independently verified by either of them. The content piece will not be updated or otherwise revised to reflect information that subsequently becomes available, or circumstances existing or changes occurring after the date hereof, or for any other reason.

Certain information contained herein constitutes “forward-looking statements,” which can be identified by the use of terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “projects,” “future,” “targets,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates” (or the negatives thereof) or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. Forward looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, which are beyond the control of Mainsail. Actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities could differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. Additional risks of which Mainsail is not currently aware also could cause actual results to differ. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. The forward-looking events discussed in this content piece may not occur. Mainsail undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

No representation, warranty or undertaking, express or implied, is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions contained in the enclosed materials by Mainsail and no liability is accepted by such persons for the accuracy or completeness of any such information or opinions. For additional important disclosures, please click here.