David Farsai Named a Top 40 under 40 Growth Investor by GrowthCap

David Farsai Named a Top 40 under 40 Growth Investor by GrowthCap
December 22, 2022 Mainsail Partners

David Farsai, a Partner at Mainsail Partners, was named to GrowthCap’s Top 40 under 40 Growth Investor list of 2022.

At Mainsail, I have been fortunate to partner with many experienced founders, CEOs and management teams of bootstrapped software companies and to support them in realizing their full potential. In my 10 years at Mainsail, we have been disciplined in our strategy of investing in growing, B2B software companies and helping them in their next phase of growth. It is a privilege to collaborate with the founders and management teams that I work with, and I’m honored to have been named to this list. – David Farsai

According to GrowthCap, awardees were selected based on the depth of their deal experience, ability to help the companies they invest in, collaborative work style, and progression towards firm and industry leadership roles, among other attributes. Read more about David and his fellow honorees here. 

 

The Top 40 under 40 Growth Investors of 2022 recognition presented herein is awarded by GrowthCap, a third-party that is not affiliated with Mainsail Partners or an investor in Mainsail Partners-sponsored vehicles. The recognition was awarded on 12/22/22 for the period 2022. GrowthCap assessed nominees based on written responses to questions on GrowthCap’s nomination form. The number of nominees reviewed for this recognition was not disclosed to Mainsail, and therefore, it and the percentage of nominees receiving the recognition, cannot be disclosed herein. GrowthCap’s recognition is based on its own evaluation and opinion and is not indicative of Mainsail Partners’ future performance, and does not reflect the experience of, or any rating by, Mainsail Partners’ investors. Mainsail Partners paid a fee to distribute the GrowthCap Top 40 under 40 Growth Investors of 2022 results. The receipt of compensation influences, and is likely to present a potential material conflict of interest, relating to the rating. There can be no assurance that other providers or surveys would reach the same conclusions as the foregoing. For more information regarding this recognition, please see the linked publication.